AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Does intel power gadget 3 interfere8/2/2023 Up to 20 threads of computing are supported, and the cache is 24 MB. 6 productive cores with a clock frequency of 2.6 to 5.4 GHz and 8 energy-efficient cores with a clock frequency of 1.9 to 4.1 GHz. It is manufactured using the Intel 7 process and includes 14 cores. We had a top-of-the-line configuration with an Intel Core i9-13900H processor. Inside are 13th generation Intel Raptor Lake processors and GeForce RTX 4000-series graphics cards. The ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 (2023) GU604 laptop is equipped with up-to-date powerful components, but with minor limitations caused by the compact and thin body. It is also possible to calibrate the screen using the X-Rite i1 Display Pro calibrator. The Game Visual section has several picture modes. HDR is forced on in HDR mode, and when turned off, the screen works like a regular IPS. The ROG Armoury Crate app has useful display settings: overdrive, power saving (lower refresh rate), and multi-zone backlighting. There is support for G-Sync frame rate synchronisation. It promises a maximum brightness of 600 cd/m2 in manual mode and 1100 cd/m2 peak value. Colour coverage is 100% DCI-P3, refresh rate: 240 Hz, response time: 3 ms, the display is Pantone certified, has Dolby Vision support and VESA Display HDR 1000 certification. The screen has an aspect ratio of 16:10 and a WQXGA resolution (2560 x 1600). Mini LEDs have very high brightness, contrast and uniformity of backlighting. The peculiarity of Mini LED is that 1024 small LEDs are responsible for backlighting, thanks to which local dimming is implemented. ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 (2023) GU604 is no exception. Most of ASUS' top gaming laptops have ROG Nebula HDR Display Mini LED screens. What about performance and battery life?.How comfortable is the ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 (2023) GU604?.What about the appearance and construction of ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 (2023) GU604?.Noisy cooling system, overheating at peak loads.Stylish appearance and compact body (considering the 16-inch screen and components)Ģ reasons not to buy ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 (2023) GU604:.Excellent 16-inch Mini LED screen with a refresh rate of 240 Hz.Which is a far cry from “the new MacBook sucks at everything just because it sucks at premiere”.A powerful gaming laptop with a 16-inch Mini LED display with a resolution of 2560x1600, an aspect ratio of 16:10 and a refresh rate of 240 Hz, a top-of-the-line Intel Core i9 13th generation processor, 32 GB of RAM, a discrete NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 video card and a fast PCIe 4.0 x4 SSD storage Current price on AmazonĦ reasons to buy ASUS ROG Zephyrus M16 (2023) GU604: Which basically boils down to - use a Mac for Final Cut Pro and windows for premiere. What he has done here is allow users to make a more informed decision. Just like his earlier video showing how Final Cut Pro runs smoothly on a MacBook, it just proves that Macs are optimised for certain workflows and suck at others. Sure, it was informative to a degree and had some results, but I wasn't really keen in the statement that the results were "skewed" due to the use of Premiere and that the actual title of the video was kinda condescending by saying that everyone is "wrong" about the Core i9 MBP That's one of the reasons why I was kinda let down by the Morisson video. But if the same happens to the Mac, it goes into one of those "You're using it wrong" scenarios. When this happens to a Windows laptop (which has), you'll see people quickly criticizing and even bash it. I hate to say it, but part of the reason why are due to the apologists. And if you don't have hard TDP limits, you should at least give the maker of the machine or better the user the ability to fine tune the power consumption a bit and allow either a more safe/conservative setting and the shit what we have right now. It might give you the edge in (some) benchmarks but in the long run it causes more trouble than its worth. That doesn't look like it is a particularly good idea. So the CPU runs free and goes way over the TDP until the heatsink is saturated and throttles again. What that looks like is that this isn't really a 45W TDP Chip and neither hasconfigurable TDP limit like AMD has implemented since Kaveri (just look for cTDP). and that seems to be the biggest problem here and that its not possible for the manufacturer of the Device to define Power Limits and implement it so that they can make their cooling for the chip. You know in every video that the Intel power tool also shows how much power the CPU is using right? TDP != Power Draw ever for CPUs, never has meant that.Īnd yes the i7 has similar problems but much less of an issue so actually in many cases performs better than the i9
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |